The Influence of Age on the Perception of Decriminalizing Marijuana Research Paper

The Influence of Age on the Perception of De viciousizing Marijuana - Research Paper ExampleCannabis refers to products which whitethorn be obtained from the hemp plant, which is scientifically known as cannabis. Marijuana is obtained from cannabis(Jenkins, 2006). Pacula, et al. (2005) defined the term decriminalization almost literally as the removal in the criminal status of cannabis possession offenses (P. 348). However, Pacula, et al. (2005) observed that decriminalization remained undefined in the field of international policy. It is also worth mentioning at this point that a estimate of countries and sub-jurisdictions who were publicized to have decriminalized marijuana actually just reduced the penalties for offenses pertaining to possession of marijuana or cannabis for amounts specified by law (Pacula, 2005). The following studies were reviewed every for their direct or indirect bearing on the topic of this employment McCoun et al. (2009) suggested that the consequence of the law on decriminalization of marijuana varies among age groups. In full-grown populations, the law has a significant effect on marijuana use. Inversely, youth populations appear to be unfazed by regulations and sanctions (as cited in McCoun, et al. 2009). McCoun, et al. (2009) also argued that the impact of legal sanctions differs importantly depending on the age group being studied. Results of their analysis of Australian cannabis consumption show that the youth have a lower tendency to be swayed by legal sanctions. In contrast, adult subjects are largely influenced by government policies. The authors expressed concern about immediately concluding that the youth are less sensitive to marijuana-related arrests because unripe people are more impulsive and prone to risky behavior. The McCoun, et al. (2009) study has the most bearing on the current study in the sense that the study tackled decriminalization of marijuana and that the effect of age was studies as a predictor varia ble. However, the McCoun (2009) work is different from the present study since the effect of age on prohibition was studied, instead of the effect of age on perceptions about decriminalizing marijuana as proposed in this study. Reyda and Farley (2006) supports the popular notion about young people and marijuana use. The authors cited evidence revealed in their study that vulnerability of adolescents to be influenced to use marijuana is lessened as they grow older. In addition, it is shown that adolescents are prone to miscalculating risks and developing biases in terms of decision making and judgment than when they grow older. Reyda and Farleys work has indirect bearing on the study, but nonetheless, their findings bolster this research workers position that college students as young people would be supportive of decriminalizing marijuana since marijuana use is tagged to younger people. Meanwhile, Fetherston and Lenton (2005) investigated public perception on the legalization of cannabis by conducting randomized phone surveys on 809 residents of Western Australia. The respondents were asked regarding their views on cannabis legalization, attitudes towards a proposed legislative model, and their opinion of its perceived effects. Initial musician responses show that majority of respondents share a negative view regarding cannabis. However, most participants consider criminal sanctions against cannabis use as inappropriate and ineffective.