How Dracula Is The Most Famous Literary Vampire - 1658 Words

An Immortal Soul: Why Dracula is the Most Famous Literary Vampire The title character and antagonist of Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel Dracula is an easily recognizable character in the Western canon. Without ever reading the book or watching any of the countless movie adaptations, people will craft vampire characters with feelings and behaviors nearly identical to those of Dracula. However, Dracula’s success is not because it was the first novel of its kind. Vampiric literature had been around for at least a century, and two works, Varney the Vampire and Carmilla, were popular at the time of Dracula’s publication. Why has Dracula become the stereotypical vampire figure when there are other well-rounded characters of the type? The answer†¦show more content†¦In their article, they compare and contrast the characters of Dracula and Carmilla. Their argument emphasized the prototype theory, which can explain why some figures are more important than others in tropes. Carmilla is less thought of a prototypical vampire because she is unfathomably beautiful by human standards, is only able to become animalistic by turning into a panther, and valued sexual intimacy over blood. Dracula is the target in a monster-slaying narrative, a plot that fosters more creativity. Audiences were intrigued by a story where humans kill monsters instead of the other way around. Dracula became more famous than Carmilla and its other predecessors because the former was one of the first books to conform to the plot of monster-hunting narratives, and because humans are afraid of ugly, nefarious beings (par. 6-7, 13-14 ). A critic may, however, use their own perspective to counteract the argument about why Dracula is a better monster. Fans of other classic vampiric figures would be swift in defending their beloved characters if such a situation arose. Le Fanu’s Carmilla, unfortunately, does not get the recognition it deserves. The book has many adaptations as does Dracula, but is not as universally recognizable. It can be argued as a more enjoyable text using the same explanations Saler and Ziegler used to denounce it. While Carmilla is not the prototype for all vampires, she is

Analysis Of James Mcpherson s What They Fought For...

James McPherson the author of What They Fought For 1861-1865, thesis states that the soldiers from both the North and South fought for a large extent for ideology, and not exclusively as brothers in war with other soldiers, for principles of strength or courage, and for the nations of honor and duty. McPherson uses hundreds of letters and diaries from soldiers from both the Union and Confederate troops to show their experience. He tries to focus on a variety of attitudes and motives from the volunteer soldiers. These young men coped with fear, stress, exhaustion, pain, and death everyday while out there fighting. â€Å"A final theme that will receive attention is ideology,† (McPherson 1) this is what the soldiers supposed they were fighting for during the Civil War. In the first chapter it shows the side of the southern Confederate armies. They start to compare the Civil War to the Revolutionary War. Their enemies, known as Northern Yankees, were nothing more than just dictators trying to destroy the south. It’s the same technique the British did to the colonists almost a century ago. This is what gave them their southern freedom, by walking in the shoes of their forefathers and fight for their liberties and constitutional rights. He then starts to talk about the Confederates lives by the letters and journals that they wrote during the Civil War. Each letter talks about different things; how the Southern soldiers felt about the war, talks about their enemies the Yanks, slaves,Show MoreRelatedEssay on What They Fought for708 Words   |  3 PagesWhat They Fought For 1861 - 1865 This book was a good analysis of Civil War soldiers diaries, and letters to their loved ones. Which explains what they were going through in their lives and what they fought for and risked their lives for in this conflict. In the book the author James M. McPherson uses information from l00s of diaries and letters from the soldiers to learn why they fought in this war. The Union soldiers fought to preserve the Nation that was created in 1776, to save itRead More`` For Cause And Comrades `` By Kathryn Shively Meir Of Nature s Civil War1840 Words   |  8 Pagesused by two authors to use these firsthand accounts for differing outcomes. Author James McPherson provides a comprehensive analysis of the Civil War using over 25,000 letters and 250 private diaries in his book, For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. McPherson in his book answers to age-old questions; who was the common soldier and why did soldiers fight – what was their motivation? While McPherson answers these questions, another author uses diaries and letters of Civil War soldiersRead MoreAfrican-Americans in the Civil War2279 Words   |  10 PagesThe foundation for black participation in the Civil War began more than a hundred years before the outbreak of the war. Blacks in America had been in bondage since early colonial times. In 1776, when Jefferson proclaimed mankind s inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, the institution of slavery had become firmly established in America. Blacks worked in the tobacco fields of Virginia, in the rice fields of South Carolina, and toiled in small farms and shops in the NorthRead MoreBattle Cry of Freedom1911 Words   |  8 PagesUnited States History i | Battle Cry of Freedom | The Civil War Era by: James M. McPherson | | Sandra Dunlap | 4/16/2010 | James M. McPherson was born October 11, 1936. He is considered to be an American Civil War historian and he is a professor at Princeton University. He received the Pulitzer Prize for his book Battle Cry of Freedom and Wikipedia states this was his most famous book. He holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Ph. D. and teaches United States History at Princeton UniversityRead MoreThe American Civil War : The United States8725 Words   |  35 PagesThe American Civil War, known in the United States as simply the Civil War as well as by other sectional names, was a civil war fought from 1861 to 1865 to determine the survival of the Union or independence for the Confederacy. Of the 34 states that existed in January 1861, seven Southern slave states individually declared their secession from the United States and went on to form the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy, often simply called the South, grew to include eleven states, althoughRead MoreThe American Civil War : The United States6683 Words   |  27 Pages  The American Civil War, widely known in the United States as simply the Civil War as well as other sectional names, was a civil war fought from 1861 to 1865 to determine the survival of the Union or independence for the Confederacy. Among the 34 states in January 1861, seven Southern slave states individually declared their secession from the United States and formed the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy, often simply called the South, grew to include eleven states, and although theyRead MoreTo What Extent Was Slavery the Cause of the American Civil War?4178 Words   |  17 Pagesthe period 1763-1865, how far was the American Civil War caused by long term divisions over the issue of slavery? In his second inaugural address in March 1865, Abraham Lincoln looked back at the beginning of the Civil War four years earlier all knew, he said, that slavery was somehow the cause of the war. This essay will endeavour to discuss the role of long term divisions caused by the slavery debate in the eventual outbreak of the Civil War. In doing so this analysis will encompass theRead MoreContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pagesways of improving it. Although always appealing to his economic understandings, he has been open to a wide variety of other ideas, recognizing their intellectual strengths and capabilities rather than making artificial distinctions between what is acceptable and what is not. He also has contributed widely to the accounting literature, taking forward the British tradition of economic theorizing in financial accounting as well as being a constant source of creative thinking in the management accounting

Search Techniques

Question: Describe two techniques that you can apply to narrow or broaden a search. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each. Which approach will improve the effectiveness of your searches? Answer: Search Techniques: Searching is a process to find required information from specific source. Search can be applied using specific algorithms. There are different searching techniques available according to narrow down search time and efficiency. The article would be on two techniques and its effectiveness. Sometimes search is applied to find out element in list. Search techniques can be applied on sorted and unsorted data. In this proposed document we would be discussing two of them Linear Search Binary Search Linear Search: Linear search algorithm is used to search element in array list. Linear search is applied on sorted and unsorted data. In this technique searching is done from left to right in array and it runs again and again till element is not found. Therefore it is called sequential search. It is the simplest search technique and in worst case scenario complexity is number of elements in list. Linear search is applied in mostly array type data structure. The major advantage of this technique is that it can be implemented easily and disadvantage is that it requires large space to run. Binary Search: Binary search is applied on only sorted data only. This technique is the best approach of searching element and can be applied on any data structure. It works as dividing list into small lists and checks element from left to middle and from middle term to right. Basically whole list is divided into two lists by assigning terms left, middle and right most. Binary search works in two cases best case and worst case. Best case technique gives O(1) complexity and in worst case scenario is nLog(n). The main advantage of this technique is that it can be applied on any data structure.

Lab exam free essay sample

Jennings Bryan argues against the gold standard. What arguments does he give against the gold standard and why does it oppress the common people? William Jennings Bryan was against the Gold Standard because it artificially lowered inflation. In todays times the Federal Reserve can print as much money as it wants and also control how the money circulates in the economy by buying and selling bonds. With the gold standard there was an infinite amount of gold that could be mined and minted, which kept inflation artificially low.William Jennings Bryan was a proponent of bimetallismusing silver as well as gold. Using silver meant that more money could be minted and inflation could go up. At the end of the nineteenth century this particularly benefited farmers. Small farmers typically had large outstanding loans to big banks. If inflation is allowed to rise it benefits debtors because the money that they owe is less valuable. We will write a custom essay sample on Lab exam or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If the dollar weakens and youre getting more dollars for selling the same crops, it becomes easier to pay off a fixed amount of money.That is why opposition to the gold standard was so central to Bryan and the Populist movement. William Jennings Bryan, as evidenced by his particularly impassioned Cross of Gold Speech, opposed the gold standard on the premise that a bi-metal (meaning gold and silver) money standard would ease the strain on the United States economy. With just the gold standard, the moneys supply was severely restricted. With a booming economy and pressure to increase production, money wasnt as readily available and Jennings argued that the introduction of silver would ease those harms.